Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Frontiers of COVID-19: Scientific and Clinical Aspects of the Novel Coronavirus 2019 ; : 325-336, 2022.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-20235102

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has emerged as a pandemic leading to unprecedented disruption of global health and economy. Countries with a large population of European/Hispanic ancestry have been found to have the highest COVID-19 related case fatality rates. This prompted us with an interesting question that whether host immune programming and host genetic modifiers might be responsible for the higher mortality rate in these ethnicities. Transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) is critical in priming the viral spike protein and the host ACE2 receptor before the virus enters into the host cell. Recent results from the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative identified ELF5 rs766826 as a protective factor to severe COVID-19 which decreases the expression of TMPRSS2. Moreover, multiple studies have experimentally demonstrated that alpha 1 antitrypsin (A1AT) (encoded by SERPINA1 gene) is an inhibitor of TMPRSS2 and provided support to the already approved therapy as a candidate for COVID-19. Interestingly A1AT deficiency is common among Europeans and Latinos. We have also analyzed the gnomAD dataset to show that Europeans and Latinos have a substantially higher carrier frequency of AlAT deficiency (~12%) compared to other large ethnicities. A1AT has the dual role of an antiviral and anti-inflammatory molecule for treating COVID-19. To date, eight clinical trials have been started to find out the effectiveness of A1AT in COVID-19. Low A1AT level in severe COVID-19 has also been found to be a poor prognostic marker. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.

2.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology ; 81(16 Supplement):S12, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2299445

ABSTRACT

Background: During COVID-19 pandemic, the pattern of hospital admissions for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been changing, and increased mortality and morbidity is being noted in these patients. Patient may present with acute myocardial infarction, myocarditis simulating a presentation like STEMI, coronary spasm, myocardial injury not fulfilling the criteria of type 1 & type 2 acute MI and cardiomyopathy. In this study we have tried to determine some important differences among the patients presented with STEMI during The COVID-19 pandemic versus non-COVID-19 era. Method(s): This prospective observational study was carried out in National Heart Foundation Hospital & Research Institute from 8thMarch,2019 to 7th March, 2021. Total 2531 patients were included. The study populations were divided into two groups. Group I: Acute STEMI patients presenting during pre COVID period (n=1385). Group II: Acute STEMI patients presenting during COVID period (n=1146). COVID period was calculated from 8th march, 2020 onward as first case of COVID -19 was detected on that day in Bangladesh. All patients presented with Acute STEMI was included in the study however NSTEMI-ACS, Unstable angina were excluded from the study. Result(s): Male was predominant in both groups. Regarding risk factors Hypertension, Obesity and family H/O of CAD was statistically significant (p<0.05). Acute STEMI patients presented lately during COVID-19 period probably due to lock down& lack of transport facility. Regarding coronary artery disease severity, vessel score was more during COVID period. SV-CAD were more during pre COVID period while DV-CAD & TV-CAD were more during COVID period. Gensini score was also calculated among the study populations, it was 57.21+/-28.42 and 63.16+/- 40.43respectively in group I and group I, which was statistically significant. Regarding treatment options of the patients, primary PCI was less during COVID period, however medical management, elective PCI and Thrombolysis were more during COVID era. Regarding in hospital outcome, acute LVF, cardiogenic shock were more during COVID period which were also statistically significant. [Formula presented] [Formula presented] Conclusion(s): During COVID -19, STEMI patients presented lately in comparison to pre COVID period. Coronary artery Disease were more severe during COVID period as evaluated by Vessel Score & Gensini Score. During COVID -19 period majority of patients got medical management& routine PCI were done more in comparison to primary PCI. In Hospital outcome of STEMI was worse during COVID-19 period in terms of acute LVF & cardiogenic shock. [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented]Copyright © 2023

3.
Mymensingh Med J ; 31(4): 1108-1114, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2045555

ABSTRACT

It was previously reported that coronavirus caused myocardial injury in hospitalized patients. However, delayed cardiac involvement in symptomatic patient recovery from COVID-19 is not yet well known. The objective of this study was to evaluate cardiac involvement by using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in symptomatic post-COVID-19 recovered patients. Thirty (30) patients who recovered from COVID-19 and had recently reported cardiac symptoms were studied in a prospective observational study performed at Popular Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh from March 2021 to September 2021. They underwent CMR examinations. CMR scanning protocol included the following: black blood, cine sequence, both short-axis and long-axis, T2-weight short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequence, T2- weighted imaging (T2WI) and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and quantitative mapping sequences-native T1/T2 mapping and post-contrast T1 mapping. Myocardial edema and late gadolinium enhancement were assessed in all patients. Quantitative evaluation of native T1/T2 and ECV value and cardiac function were evaluated. There were 30 people in all in this study. The average age of the participants in the study was 36.6 years. Fourteen (46.6%) of the patients had abnormal cardiac MRI results, while the remaining 15(53.3%) had negative CMR findings. Among positive findings patients, 8(57.1%) of 14 had increased T2 signal. Increased myocardial edema was found in the same no of patients, involving 53.2% (128 of 224) of LV segments. Only 2 cases (2 of 14) showed mid myocardial and subepicardial LGE, involving 18 of 224, 8.03% of myocardial segments. Global native T1, T2 and ECV values are significantly elevated in all CMR positive findings patients. Native T1 1231ms (IQR: 1281.25-1257.5 versus 1155.5 (IQR: 1137.25-1172.75), T2 40 (IQR: 34.5-43.25) versus 35.5 (IQR: 34-37), ECV 31 (29.75-33.25) versus 23.5 (21.25-24.0), p<0.001; p<0.011 and p<0.001 respectively. Reduced RV functional were found in positive as compared with negative CMR findings patients, EF, 32.05 (IQR: 25.25-39.0) versus 54.5 (IQR: 52.0-57.75) and EDV, 117.5 (IQR: 102.0-134.25) versus 95.0 (IQR: 71.75-99.75), p<0.001 and p<0.001 respectively. In this study cardiac involvement was found in the post-COVID-19 recovered patient with cardiac symptoms. Cardiac MRI findings included myocardial edema, fibrosis and reduced right ventricular function. So attention should be paid to symptomatic post-COVID-19 recovered patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiomyopathies , Adult , Bangladesh/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , Cardiomyopathies/pathology , Contrast Media , Gadolinium , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine/adverse effects , Predictive Value of Tests , Tertiary Care Centers
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL